Skip to decisions
Žuk — ANTON и JELENA

Legal archive: reviews of court practice concerning Narva apartment associations

This section contains analytical reviews and editorial summaries of publicly available court decisions concerning relations between apartment owners and apartment associations in Narva. The information has been prepared by the Žuk Kinnisvara team for informational purposes.

We explain complex legal acts in plain language. Our archive is continually updated.

We plan to add reviews of decisions of the Supreme Court of Estonia (Riigikohus) on important issues concerning relations between apartment owners and apartment associations.

Before making important legal decisions, always check the official status and full case text in the state register (Riigi Teataja / e-Toimik).

Subjects and subtopics

A subject describes the dispute; it does not establish a violation.

Additional parameters

Reset all
2-17-115809

Narva linn, Partisani tn 3a korteriühistu · 80152273

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claims

Editorial summary

After the debtor’s objection in payment order proceedings, the association did not submit a proper claim or pay the additional fee.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-17-115809/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Partisani 3a: debt claim not accepted for proceedings after defects were not remedied

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Partisani 3a · 80152273

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — KÜ Partisani 3a; Person named as debtor — XX

Editorial summary

After the debtor’s objection in payment order proceedings, the association did not submit a proper claim or pay the additional fee.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court refused to accept for proceedings KÜ Partisani 3a’s debt claim against XX. After transfer from payment order proceedings, the association did not formulate its demand under the rules for a statement of claim or pay the additional fee in time. The debt was not determined on its merits in this ruling. The association initially sought a payment order. The debtor objected, and Pärnu Maakohus transferred the claim to Viru Maakohus. That court required the claim and grounds to be stated, supporting documents supplied and an additional fee paid within 14 days of service of its request. The association received it on 27 September 2017 but did not respond by 11 October. The court stated that payment order materials alone did not allow admission of the claim: evidence of debt and documents proving representative authority were missing. In addition, only 45 euros had been paid instead of the required 175 euro fee; the additional 130 euros did not arrive. The court therefore refused to accept for proceedings the application. It explained that upon such refusal, the returned application is regarded as never filed and the claim as never pending. Costs were left to the association; there were no sums reimbursable to other participants. The ruling neither declares no debt nor orders its payment.

Outcome of this decision

Refuse to accept for proceedings the association’s debt application. Leave all court costs to the association; there are no costs reimbursable to other participants.
2-17-11996

Narva linn, P. Kerese tn 10 korteriühistu · 80346215

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claims

Editorial summary

The association waived its claim after payment of the debt; the court separately awarded 112,50 euros in costs against the two defendants jointly and severally.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-17-11996/9Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Kerese 10: case terminated after debt payment, with half the fee awarded against defendants

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Korteriühistu Kerese 10 · 80346215

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant — Korteriühistu Kerese 10; Defendants — XX and XX

Editorial summary

The association waived its claim after payment of the debt; the court separately awarded 112,50 euros in costs against the two defendants jointly and severally.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court accepted Korteriühistu Kerese 10’s waiver of its claim against XX and XX and terminated the debt case. The association was awarded 112,50 euros in court costs against the two defendants jointly and severally. This is a common amount recoverable from either, but the full amount may not be collected twice. On 26 September 2017, the association told the court that the defendants had paid the debt and requested termination. The court accepted the waiver as admissible and explained that the same claim against the same defendants on the same grounds cannot be brought again. The ruling does not state the initial debt amount or detailed objections from the defendants. Because the claim was satisfied after filing, the court allocated costs to the defendants. The association had paid a 225 euro state fee on filing. The court awarded only half, 112,50 euros, against the defendants because the association could request the other half back from the budget. No such application existed when the ruling was made, and the court did not order that refund. The court refused legal costs. Although a services invoice was attached to the claim, there were no documents signed and filed by a representative. Nor did the court see that the representative’s work had enabled timely and proper compliance with court requests. The debt is not awarded again by this ruling. Actual payment of the newly awarded costs is not confirmed.

Outcome of this decision

Accept the waiver and terminate proceedings. Award the association 112,50 euros in fees against the two defendants XX jointly and severally. No legal costs were awarded; this act does not order refund of the other half of the fee from the budget.
2-17-11991

Narva linn, Uusküla tn 9 korteriühistu · 80180269

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

The owner did not respond to the served claim; the court awarded debt, interest and 253 euros in costs by default.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-17-11991/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Uusküla 9: utility debt, interest and costs awarded by default

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Uusküla 9 · 80180269

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant — KÜ Uusküla 9; Defendant — owner XX

Editorial summary

The owner did not respond to the served claim; the court awarded debt, interest and 253 euros in costs by default.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court granted KÜ Uusküla 9’s claim against owner XX by default. The association was awarded principal and accrued interest, and separately a 175 euro state fee and 78 euros in legal costs. The association alleged that the defendant had not made mandatory monthly payments for building maintenance. It sought the debt, accrued interest and court costs. According to the act, the claim documents and court ruling were served personally on the defendant, confirmed by a signature. The court required a written response and warned of a possible default judgment. No response or objections arrived in time. The court found the claim legally justified and applied the default procedure rules. Under this procedure, the claimant’s factual assertions are deemed admitted due to the absence of a timely response. Costs were also allocated to the defendant: the court awarded 253 euros for the fee and legal assistance. The judgment was declared immediately enforceable without security. It does not confirm that the association actually received the money.

Outcome of this decision

Award the association principal, accrued interest, a 175 euro state fee and 78 euros in legal costs against XX. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security.
2-17-9833

Narva linn, Turu tn 3 korteriühistu · 80228912

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

The defendant did not respond to the served claim; the court awarded the association debt, accrued interest and costs by default.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-17-9833/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Nartur-3: utility debt, interest and court costs awarded by default

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Nartur-3 · 80228912

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant — KÜ Nartur-3; Defendant — owner XX; Association’s representative XX

Editorial summary

The defendant did not respond to the served claim; the court awarded the association debt, accrued interest and costs by default.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court granted KÜ Nartur-3’s claim against owner XX by default. The association was awarded utility debt and accrued late-payment interest. Court costs were awarded separately: a 175 euro state fee and 78 euros in legal costs, totalling 253 euros. The association alleged that the defendant was obliged to pay monthly for building maintenance but had made no payments. It sought those amounts and costs, and requested a default judgment if no response arrived. The first mailing of the claim documents was returned. The court sent the documents to another established address and deemed them served on 22 August 2017 by placement in a mailbox. The defendant was required to submit a written response and warned of a possible default judgment. No response or objections were submitted in time. The court found the claim legally justified. Under the default procedure rules applied, the facts stated by the claimant are deemed admitted if there is no timely response. The judgment was declared immediately enforceable without security. This permits immediate enforcement but does not confirm payment of the money awarded.

Outcome of this decision

Award the association debt, accrued interest and 253 euros in court costs against XX, including a 175 euro fee and 78 euros in legal costs. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security.
2-17-10856

Narva linn, Uusküla tn 1 korteriühistu · 80175825

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

After personal service of the ruling accepting the claim, the defendant did not respond; the court gave a default judgment.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-17-10856/4Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Uusküla 1: court awarded debt and late-payment interest by default after no response

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Uusküla tn 1 KÜ ·

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant – Uusküla tn 1 KÜ; Defendant – owner XX; Association’s contractual representative XX

Editorial summary

After personal service of the ruling accepting the claim, the defendant did not respond; the court gave a default judgment.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court granted the claim by the apartment association Uusküla tn 1 against owner XX by default. The association was awarded principal and accrued late-payment interest against the defendant, plus 295 euros in litigation costs. The judgment was declared immediately enforceable. The association applied to the court on 14 July 2017. It alleged that the defendant owned an apartment and owed the association the stated arrears and late-payment interest. The brief judgment contains no further details of how the debt arose or substantive objections from the defendant. The court accepted the claim on 20 July. The ruling accepting it was served personally on the defendant against signature on 28 July 2017. The court allowed 14 days from service to respond and warned that failure to respond could result in a default judgment. The defendant did not respond in time. The court applied the default judgment rules and granted the claim. Litigation costs comprise a 250-euro court fee and 45 euros in contractual representative’s costs. The court found them justified and fully reimbursable. No separate continuing late-payment interest was awarded by this judgment. Immediate enforceability does not confirm actual payment of the debt or costs.

Outcome of this decision

Award the association debt, accrued late-payment interest and 295 euros in costs against XX. The judgment is immediately enforceable.
2-17-9661

Narva linn, Oru tn 17 korteriühistu · 80145965

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

The defendant did not respond within the time limit; the court awarded the association debt, late-payment interest and costs by default.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-17-9661/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Oru 17: debt, accrued and continuing late-payment interest awarded by default

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva Oru 17 KÜ · 80145965

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant – Narva Oru 17 KÜ; Defendant – owner XX; Association’s contractual representative XX

Editorial summary

The defendant did not respond within the time limit; the court awarded the association debt, late-payment interest and costs by default.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court granted the claim by the apartment association Narva Oru 17 against owner XX by default. It awarded debt for building maintenance and utilities, accrued late-payment interest and continuing late-payment interest of 0,07% per day on the principal until payment. The association alleged that the defendant had not paid the invoices in full. It claimed the debt and interest for late payment. The court accepted the claim and deemed the corresponding ruling served by placement in the mailbox on 27 July 2017. It allowed 14 days to respond and warned the defendant of a possible default judgment. No response arrived in time. The court granted the claim under the default judgment rules and declared the judgment immediately enforceable. The defendant was also ordered to pay 525 euros in litigation costs: a 225-euro court fee and 300 euros in contractual representative’s costs. The court found them justified and fully reimbursable. The judgment confirms the awards, rather than actual payment.

Outcome of this decision

Award debt, accrued late-payment interest and continuing late-payment interest of 0,07% per day on the principal until payment. Award 525 euros in costs. The judgment is immediately enforceable.
2-17-10788

Narva linn, Mõisa tn 7 korteriühistu · 80218948

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claims

Editorial summary

The association sought payment of arrears; after no response arrived, the court granted the claim by default.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-17-10788/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Mõisa 7: debt of 1484,04 euros and litigation costs awarded by default

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KORTERIÜHISTU MÕISA 7 NARVA · 80218948

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant – KORTERIÜHISTU MÕISA 7 NARVA; Defendant – owner XX; Association’s contractual representative XX

Editorial summary

The association sought payment of arrears; after no response arrived, the court granted the claim by default.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court granted the claim by the apartment association MÕISA 7 NARVA against owner XX by default. The defendant was ordered to pay arrears for building maintenance and utilities, plus 245 euros in litigation costs. The judgment was declared immediately enforceable. The association alleged that the defendant owned an apartment and was an association member but failed to pay the invoiced charges. No separate demand for late-payment interest is stated in this judgment. The court stated that the claim documents had been duly served on the defendant. It allowed 14 days from service for a written response and warned of a possible default judgment. No response arrived. Under the rule applied by the court, the claimant’s factual allegations are deemed admitted by the defendant in these circumstances. The court granted the monetary claim, referring to the owner’s duty to contribute to expenses. The court found justified a 200-euro court fee and 45 euros in legal expenses for preparing and drafting the claim. In assessing representative’s costs, it considered the case’s complexity and the volume and quality of work. These costs were awarded against the defendant. The judgment provides no information about actual payment of the debt or costs.

Outcome of this decision

Award the association the debt and 245 euros in litigation costs against XX, including a 200-euro court fee and 45 euros in legal expenses. The judgment is immediately enforceable.
2-17-9848

Narva linn, Turu tn 3 korteriühistu · 80228912

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

The brief default judgment awards the association debt with late-payment interest and litigation costs; it does not describe the circumstances of the dispute.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-17-9848/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Natur-3: debt with late-payment interest and 178 euros in costs awarded by default

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Natur-3 · 80228912

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant – KÜ Natur-3; Defendant XX; Association representative XX

Editorial summary

The brief default judgment awards the association debt with late-payment interest and litigation costs; it does not describe the circumstances of the dispute.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court granted the debt claim by the apartment association Natur-3 against XX by default. The association was awarded principal and accrued late-payment interest. Separately, the defendant was ordered to pay 178 euros in litigation costs: a 100-euro court fee and 78 euros in legal expenses. The court set out the result in an operative part without an account of the circumstances or reasons, using the option available for a default judgment. The judgment does not disclose the period in which the debt arose, the parties’ detailed arguments, how the claim was served or the specific circumstances underlying the default procedure. The judgment was declared immediately enforceable without security. This does not mean that the defendant has already transferred money. The judgment explains the option of applying to set aside the default judgment and reopen proceedings, and the claimant’s option of appealing. The source gives no subsequent outcome of any such applications.

Outcome of this decision

Award the association the debt and accrued late-payment interest, plus 178 euros in litigation costs, against XX. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security.
2-17-9835

Narva linn, Turu tn 3 korteriühistu · 80228912

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

A brief default judgment awarded debt, late-payment interest and costs; it sets out no detailed circumstances or reasons.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-17-9835/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Natur-3: debt, late-payment interest and costs awarded in a brief default judgment

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Natur-3 · 80228912

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant – KÜ Natur-3; Defendant – XX

Editorial summary

A brief default judgment awarded debt, late-payment interest and costs; it sets out no detailed circumstances or reasons.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court granted the claim by KÜ Natur-3 against XX by default and awarded principal, accrued late-payment interest and litigation costs covering the court fee and legal assistance. The judgment has no account of the circumstances or reasons. This copy does not state the period in which the debt arose, the parties’ detailed positions, how the claim was served or why the defendant did not participate. These circumstances cannot be reconstructed from the operative part alone. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security but does not confirm receipt of money by the association. The defendant was informed of the option to apply to set aside the default judgment and reopen proceedings, and the claimant of the option to appeal. No subsequent review is established.

Outcome of this decision

Award the association principal, accrued late-payment interest and litigation costs against XX. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security.
2-16-126261

Narva linn, Partisani tn 3 korteriühistu · 80175376

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

No response arrived after service through the electronic court file; the court awarded debt, interest and the fee by default.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-16-126261/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Partisani 3: principal, interest and state fee awarded by default

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Korteriühistu Partisani 3 · 80175376

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant — Korteriühistu Partisani 3; Defendant — owner XX

Editorial summary

No response arrived after service through the electronic court file; the court awarded debt, interest and the fee by default.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court granted the apartment association Partisani 3’s debt and interest claim against owner XX by default. The documents and ruling admitting the claim were served through the electronic court file. A response was due within 14 days of service and a default judgment warning was given, but no response arrived. The court awarded principal, accrued late-payment interest and a 200 euro fee. The short text contains no detailed independent examination of individual charges. The court did not accept the bank commission as recoverable court costs. A separate damages claim is not excluded, but no such claim was granted in this judgment. The judgment is immediately enforceable and does not confirm actual receipt of money.

Outcome of this decision

Award the association principal, accrued interest and a 200 euro fee against XX. Refuse the bank commission as court costs. The judgment is immediately enforceable.
2-17-1783

Narva linn, V. Gerassimovi tn 4 korteriühistu · 80170236

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayObligations of multiple owners

Editorial summary

Each defendant was assigned separate debt, interest and costs amounts; no joint and several recovery of the entire amount from either was ordered.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-17-1783/8Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Gerassimovi 4: different shares of debt and interest awarded against two defendants by default

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Korteriühistu Gerassimovi 4 Narva · 80170236

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant — Korteriühistu Gerassimovi 4 Narva; Defendants — two co-owners XX

Editorial summary

Each defendant was assigned separate debt, interest and costs amounts; no joint and several recovery of the entire amount from either was ordered.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court granted the apartment association Gerassimovi 4 Narva’s claim against two co-owners XX by default. Separate principal and accrued interest amounts were set for each according to ownership shares; further interest of 0,07% per day was awarded on each unpaid principal until payment. One defendant received the documents against signature; the other received them by placement in a mailbox. They were allowed 14 days to respond with a warning of a default judgment, but neither responded in time. The monetary obligations and state fee were assigned separately to each defendant, rather than jointly and severally. The text contains no detailed examination of individual charges. The judgment is immediately enforceable but does not confirm actual receipt of money.

Outcome of this decision

Award principal, accrued interest and a fee separately against each defendant XX. Further interest of 0,07% per day runs on the corresponding unpaid principal until payment. No joint and several recovery of the entire amount from either defendant was ordered. The judgment is immediately enforceable.
2-15-17330

Narva linn, Rakvere tn 30 korteriühistu · 80175096

Contracts and servicesTenancy and leaseApartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedules

Editorial summary

Under the agreement, the tenancy was recognised as remaining in force; XX was allowed to pay costs and debt owed to the association in instalments.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-15-17330/49Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Rakvere 30: agreement preserved a municipal tenancy and provided instalment payments

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn · SA Narva Linnaelamu · KÜ Rakvere 30 Narva · · 90003404 · 80175096

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant — tenant XX; Defendant — Narva linn; City’s representative — SA Narva Linnaelamu; Third party on the city’s side — KÜ Rakvere 30 Narva

Editorial summary

Under the agreement, the tenancy was recognised as remaining in force; XX was allowed to pay costs and debt owed to the association in instalments.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved an agreement between XX and Narva linn, acting through SA Narva Linnaelamu, and ended the dispute seeking to cancel termination of a municipal tenancy. The parties confirmed that the tenancy remained in force. KÜ Rakvere 30 Narva participated as a third party on the city’s side. Under the agreement, XX agreed to pay court costs owed to SA Narva Linnaelamu and utility and maintenance debt owed to the association in instalments. The city retained the right to terminate the tenancy if the tenancy terms and the agreement’s utility payment and maintenance terms were breached. This is an agreed resolution preserving the tenancy, rather than a separate judicial determination of the lawfulness of the earlier termination. Each participant bears its other costs. Actual performance of the agreement has not been established.

Outcome of this decision

Approve the agreement: the parties confirmed continuation of the municipal tenancy and agreed instalments for costs and debt owed to the association. Terminate the case. The city retains its right to terminate for breaches specified in the agreement; each participant bears its other costs.