Skip to decisions
Žuk — ANTON и JELENA
Back to decisions

Claim withdrawn after payment: no second refund of the fee

Editorial summary

The association withdrew its claim against two defendants after reporting payment. The court terminated proceedings but refused to refund half the court fee because the defendants had already reimbursed it.

Order accepting withdrawal and terminating proceedings · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Rakvere tn 40 korteriühistu · 80175535

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsBills and justification of charges
Participants and roles
  • Claimant — Narva linn, Rakvere tn 40 korteriühistu
  • Defendants — two individuals XX

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Rakvere tn 40 korteriühistu, named in the order as KÜ Rakvere 40, sought a debt from two defendants XX. The association later withdrew its claim, reporting full payment. One defendant also reported payment of 1501 euros in debt, a 191.73-euro court fee and 156.93 euros in legal costs, while stating that debt calculations had not been supplied. The court accepted the withdrawal and terminated proceedings. It explained that the same claim on the same grounds between the same parties could not be brought again. The order made no new debt award. The association requested a refund of half the court fee, but the court refused because the case materials showed that the defendants had already reimbursed the fee in full. It also refused the defendant’s request to obtain evidence of the debt calculations: no counterclaim had been filed and payment had satisfied the original claim. Entry into force and subsequent appeals have not been reverified.

Outcome of this decision

Withdrawal was accepted and proceedings terminated. Refund of half the court fee was refused because the defendants had reimbursed it; the request for debt calculations was also refused. No new sum was awarded.

Entry into force has not been reverified