Juuli 3: written debt proceedings without an agreed settlement

The defendant did not dispute the calculation and wanted a settlement, but proposed no specific terms; the court awarded the debt by judgment.

KÜ 26. JUULI 3 Narva (now — Narva linn, Juuli tn 3 korteriühistu) claimed dwelling-maintenance costs and late-payment interest from the owner XX. XX submitted a written response, did not dispute the calculation or basis of the claim and wished to settle. However, no specific payment schedule or settlement proposal was submitted. The court decided the case in writing and awarded payment by judgment; this was neither a default judgment nor approval of a settlement. The court found the claim justified and awarded principal and late-payment interest already accrued. Its reasoning referred to late-payment interest of 0.07% per day, but the operative part does not award continuing late-payment interest until payment. Procedural costs were imposed on XX; the association was awarded its paid state fee of 225 euros. The participants were informed of an appeal to Tartu Ringkonnakohus within 30 days after service, no later than five months after public announcement. Subsequent review or actual receipt of money is not established.

Principal, accrued late-payment interest and a 225-euro state fee were awarded in written proceedings. No settlement or payment schedule was approved; continuing late-payment interest was not awarded in the operative part. Actual performance is not established.