Juuli tn 3: court ended damages case after association waived its demand

The association waived its demand against two individuals XX, describing it as unfounded. One participant agreed; the other did not participate.

The apartment association Narva linn, Juuli tn 3 made a damages demand against two interested persons XX. It then waived the application, stating that it considered its own demand unfounded. One participant XX agreed to termination and confirmed having no costs. The other had not been served and did not participate; consent is not inferred from silence. The court examined the association’s right to dispose of the demand and whether waiver was permissible. It found no conflict with law or public interest, accepted the waiver and ended proceedings by its ruling of 14 September 2026. The statement that the demand was unfounded expresses the association’s assessment, rather than an independent judicial finding of no damage or liability. Costs were left with the applicant association, with none reimbursable. The operative part establishes neither a damage amount nor any duty of the individuals to pay. The ruling ends a specific proceeding after voluntary waiver; it is not an award or confirmation that damage was compensated.

Accept the Juuli tn 3 association’s waiver of its damages application and terminate proceedings. Leave costs with the association, with none reimbursable; send the ruling to the participants.