Skip to decisions
Žuk — ANTON и JELENA
Back to decisions

Kreenholmi 33: default judgment after an additional response period

Viru Maakohus · First instance

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Kreenholmi 33: default judgment after an additional response period

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ KREENHOLMI 33 · 80175469

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant — KÜ KREENHOLMI 33; Defendant — XX

Editorial summary

The court awarded the debt by default because no response was submitted within the additional period either.

The dispute and the court’s decision

KÜ KREENHOLMI 33 (now — Narva linn, Kreenholmi tn 33 korteriühistu) claimed debt and late-payment interest from XX. The claim had been served and the court allowed an additional period for a proper response. No response arrived within that period, and the court granted the claim by default. The judgment contains no descriptive section or reasoning; the composition of service charges is not disclosed. Principal, accrued late-payment interest and 260 euros in procedural costs were awarded. All costs were imposed on XX. No continuing late-payment interest was ordered. The judgment is immediately enforceable; actual recovery is not established. The defendant was informed of reopening by kaja within 30 days after service or, for public service, after learning of the judgment or enforcement proceedings. The claimant was informed of an appeal to Tartu Ringkonnakohus within 30 days after service, no later than five months after public announcement.

Outcome of this decision

The claim was granted by default: principal, late-payment interest and 260 euros in costs were awarded. The judgment is immediately enforceable. Continuing late-payment interest and actual enforcement are not established by this act.