Narv-Keskring: partial payment and interruption of limitation
KÜ Narv-Keskring · 80180393
Participants and roles: claimant — KÜ Narv-Keskring; defendant — owner XX
How it started · editorial summary
A three-year period applied, but the court held that partial payments interrupted it.
The dispute and the court’s decision
KÜ Narv-Keskring (now — Narva linn, P. Kerese tn 2 korteriühistu). KÜ Narv-Keskring claimed management charges from owner XX. Following partial payment during proceedings, the claim was reduced to the unpaid balance. The defendant pleaded limitation in respect of that balance.
The court agreed that periodic obligations were subject to a three-year period rather than the ten years proposed by the association. However, the undisputed payment table showed regular partial payments, which the court treated as acknowledgment interrupting limitation. It held the claim timely and awarded the balance and state fee. The objection was examined on its merits, rather than by default. The judgment records earlier partial payment but not performance of the new award.
Outcome of this decision
The limitation defence was rejected because partial payment acknowledged the claim; the balance was awarded.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
1. Allow the claim.