Skip to decisions
Žuk — ANTON и JELENA
Back to decisions

Tiimani 6: debt awarded by default judgment

Viru Maakohus · First instance

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Tiimani 6: debt awarded by default judgment

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Tiimani 6 · 80175334

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant — KÜ Tiimani 6; Defendant — XX

Editorial summary

The association claimed a debt; the court granted the claim by default without a descriptive section or reasoning.

The dispute and the court’s decision

KÜ Tiimani 6 (now — Narva linn, Soldina tn 6 korteriühistu) sought payment of a debt from XX. After service of the claim documents, the court entered a default judgment under the rule on failure to submit a response. The judgment contains no descriptive section or reasoning; it does not disclose the particular charges making up the debt or the defendant’s objections. The claim was granted: principal and late-payment interest were awarded. All procedural costs were imposed on XX; the association was separately awarded its paid state fee of 255 euros. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security, but actual receipt of money is not established. The defendant was informed of kaja, an application to reopen proceedings following a default judgment: the deadline is 30 days after service or, for public service, after learning of the judgment or enforcement proceedings. The claimant was informed of an appeal to Tartu Ringkonnakohus within 30 days after service, no later than five months after public announcement. The outcome of any subsequent review is unknown.

Outcome of this decision

Principal, late-payment interest and a 255-euro state fee were awarded by default; XX bears the costs. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security. Subsequent enforcement or review is not established.