Correction of the year in the termination order
Editorial summary
In the association’s case against Agarte OÜ, the court corrected the year of its earlier order from 2012 to 2013. The rest of the order terminating proceedings remained unchanged.
Narva linn, P. Kerese tn 2 korteriühistu · 80180393
Agarte OÜ · 10369315
Participants and roles
- Claimant in the original case — Narva linn, P. Kerese tn 2 korteriühistu
- Defendant in the original case — Agarte OÜ
The dispute and the court’s decision
In the debt and interest dispute between Narva linn, P. Kerese tn 2 korteriühistu, named in the source as KÜ Narv-Keskring, and Agarte OÜ, the court identified a clerical error in its order of 5 March 2013. The introduction incorrectly gave the year as 2012 instead of 2013.
The court corrected only the year and directed that a correction note be made. All other content remained unchanged. This was a technical correction, not a new debt award, a new termination of proceedings or a fresh decision on the earlier monetary claims.
The corrected order had already accepted the association’s withdrawal and terminated proceedings. The link between the decisions is expressly confirmed by the source. Entry into force of the correction order and subsequent appeals have not been reverified.
Outcome of this decision
Only the year in the order of 5 March 2013 was corrected from 2012 to 2013. The rest remained unchanged; no new monetary sum was awarded.